Post by ResLight on Mar 8, 2014 0:37:17 GMT -5
One is claiming that "if you research Occult Theocracy published in 1933 notes on page 737 CT Russell masonic membership."
I did indeed research that book many years ago. The name of the book being referenced, however, is not "Occult Theocracy" but "Occult Theocrasy". It was written by Edith Starr Miller, AKA "Lady Queenborough". One can find this book on many sites in PDF form. She, either through ignorance or on purpose, distorted some of what Russell taught to make it appear that he was in league with some alleged plot of the Masons. Without any proof whatsoever she asserts Russell to have been a Mason. As far as I am able to determine, she is the first to ever have made such an assertion. I have not found anything that indicates that there were very many who gave serious attention to Miller's distortions and misrepresentations until Fritz Springmeier began his campaign, based on an elaborate scheme of distortion and misrepresentation of Russell.
God willing, I hope to eventually present how Miller misrepresents Russell, as well as some of her other inaccuracies, on my website.
ctr.rlbible.com/?tag=occult-theocrasy
(I have not yet posted a response to Miller, but it should appear in the list under this "tag" once I post it.)
I did indeed research that book many years ago. The name of the book being referenced, however, is not "Occult Theocracy" but "Occult Theocrasy". It was written by Edith Starr Miller, AKA "Lady Queenborough". One can find this book on many sites in PDF form. She, either through ignorance or on purpose, distorted some of what Russell taught to make it appear that he was in league with some alleged plot of the Masons. Without any proof whatsoever she asserts Russell to have been a Mason. As far as I am able to determine, she is the first to ever have made such an assertion. I have not found anything that indicates that there were very many who gave serious attention to Miller's distortions and misrepresentations until Fritz Springmeier began his campaign, based on an elaborate scheme of distortion and misrepresentation of Russell.
God willing, I hope to eventually present how Miller misrepresents Russell, as well as some of her other inaccuracies, on my website.
ctr.rlbible.com/?tag=occult-theocrasy
(I have not yet posted a response to Miller, but it should appear in the list under this "tag" once I post it.)
