I decided to review your article and I hope you do not mind if I post here. If you want to move it please feel free to do this.
Nevertheless, by comparing spiritual revealing with spiritual revealing, we conclude that God did not actually curse the serpent in itself, but rather the angel who proved to be Satan and the devil, who is represented by the serpent, and thus referred to as a serpent.
I believe that God did curse the serpent, and that the serpent was discerning and was not a spokesperson for Satan. It is interesting that the NWT tries to downplay the word “subtil” KJV and replace this with “cautious” NWT and this is a wrong translation.